tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18164409.post4654504775774324559..comments2024-03-21T11:03:31.273-07:00Comments on CIS 471: AT&T mobile Internet access -- $480 per gigabyte when over the capLarry Presshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14903269871983592883noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18164409.post-48138056067047900562009-11-30T16:39:30.311-08:002009-11-30T16:39:30.311-08:00The AT&T user should have to pay the bill beca...The AT&T user should have to pay the bill because she used their services. If she was going to use the phone for data in large amounts as she did, she should have invested in the unlimited plan. Sure, the AT&T representative could have also asked about her data uses, but whether a customer believes the cap for data is fair or not, the customer agreed to those terms when they signed the contract. Sure AT&T puts out their terms with small/fine print, but like any contract, everything should and must be laid out in front before going into any kind of agreement, especially a two year agreement. This will avoid any mishaps or problems during the duration of the contract. She will most likely not win in the case because she signed the contract with the terms that she was charged for.Rydell Oriel & Raquel Sealsnoreply@blogger.com